Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Int Heart J ; 64(3): 344-351, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235285

ABSTRACT

Although there is no sign of reinfection, individuals who have a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may experience prolonged chest discomfort and shortness of breath on exertion. This study aimed to examine the relationship between atherosclerotic coronary plaque structure and COVID-19. This retrospective cohort comprised 1269 consecutive patients who had coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) between July 2020 and April 2021. The type of atherosclerotic plaque was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the severity of coronary stenosis as determined via the Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification and the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. To reveal the relationship between the history of COVID-19 and the extent and severity of CAD, propensity score analysis and further multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. The median age of the study population was 52 years, with 53.5% being male. COVID-19 was present in 337 individuals. The median duration from COVID-19 diagnosis to CCTA extraction was 245 days. The presence of atherosclerotic soft plaque (OR: 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-3.11, P = 0.001), mixed plaque (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.39-4.43, P = 0.001), and high-risk plaque (OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.98-3.84, P < 0.001) was shown to be linked with the history of COVID-19 on the conditional multivariate regression analysis of the propensity-matched population. However, no statistically significant association was found between the history of COVID-19 and the severity of coronary stenosis based on CAD-RADS and CAC score. We found that the history of COVID-19 might be associated with coronary atherosclerosis assessed via CCTA.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Stenosis , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/complications , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Coronary Angiography/methods , COVID-19 Testing , Risk Factors , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/epidemiology , Coronary Stenosis/complications , Computed Tomography Angiography , Predictive Value of Tests
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(9): e33132, 2023 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287837

ABSTRACT

The primary aim of the current study is to analyze the clinical, laboratory, and demographic data comparing the patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to our intensive care unit before and after the UK variant was first diagnosed in December 2020. The secondary objective was to describe a treatment approach for COVID-19. Between Mar 12, 2020, and Jun 22, 2021, 159 patients with COVID-19 were allocated into 2 groups: the variant negative group (77 patients before December 2020) and the variant positive group (82 patients after December 2020). The statistical analyses included early and late complications, demographic data, symptoms, comorbidities, intubation and mortality rates, and treatment options. Regarding early complications, unilateral pneumonia was more common in the variant (-) group (P = .019), whereas bilateral pneumonia was more common in the variant (+) group (P < .001). Regarding late complications, only cytomegalovirus pneumonia was observed more frequently in the variant (-) group (P = .023), whereas secondary gram (+) infection, pulmonary fibrosis (P = .048), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P = .017), and septic shock (P = .051) were more common in the variant (+) group. The therapeutic approach showed significant differences in the second group such as plasma exchange and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation which is more commonly used in the variant (+) group. Although mortality and intubation rates did not differ between the groups, severe challenging early and late complications were observed mainly in the variant (+) group, necessitating invasive treatment options. We hope that our data from the pandemic will shed light on this field. Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that there is much to be done to deal with future pandemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clinical Laboratory Services , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , Cohort Studies , Pandemics , Disease Progression
3.
Acta Cardiol ; : 1-6, 2022 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1805772

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count (TFC) is an index that provides a quantitative evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of COVID-19 infection on TFC in patients admitted with chest pain and dyspnoea after COVID-19 disease and had abnormal findings in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. METHODS: For this single-center retrospective study, patients with and without a history of COVID-19 who were underwent coronary angiography for abnormal findings in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy between January 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021 were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups as patients with COVID-19 history and those without. After exclusion criteria, patients with adequate angiographic monitoring and data were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients, 48 with a history of COVID-19, were included in the study. The mean age was ±55 10 years, and 122 (58%) patients were women. In patients with a history of COVID-19, TFC was significantly higher in the LAD (p < 0.001) and LCx (p < 0.001) arteries and RCA TFC (p = 0.223) was similar in both groups. In the linear mix model, male gender (ß = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.26-3.51, p < 0.001) and history of COVID-19 (ß = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.49-2.53, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with TFC. CONCLUSION: TFC may be elevated due to coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with a history of COVID-19.

4.
5.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 38(2): 447-456, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1527480

ABSTRACT

We aimed to examine the effect of a history of COVID-19 on myocardial ischemia in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in patients who presented with shortness of breath and/or chest pain after recovery. For this single-center retrospective study, patients who presented at cardiology outpatient clinics and had SPECT-MPI were screened. A total of 1888 patients were included in the study, 340 of whom had a history of COVID-19. 64 patients with > 50% stenosis on coronary angiography were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of the study was abnormal MPI. In the study population, the median age was 56 (49-64 IQR) years, and 1127 (65%) of the patients were female. Abnormal MPI was detected in 77 patients (23%) in the COVID-19 group and in 244 patients (16%) in the non-COVID-19 group. After adjustment was performed for clinical predictors using Bayesian logistic regression, an important association was found between the presence of a confirmed prior COVID-19 infection and abnormal MPI (posterior median odds ratio, 1.70 [95% CrI, 1.20-2.40], risk difference, 9.6% [95% CrI, 1.8%, 19.7%]). In SPECT-MPI, ischemia rates were observed to be higher in COVID-19 group and it was found that a confirmed prior COVID-19 might predict of abnormal MPI.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Ischemia , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , Bayes Theorem , COVID-19/complications , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon/methods
6.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 27: 10760296211048808, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1495924

ABSTRACT

We aimed to investigate association between mean platelet volume (MVP), platelet distribution width (PDW) and red cell distribution width (RDW) and mortality in patients with COVID-19 and find out in which patients the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) affects the prognosis due to the effect of MPV on thromboxan A2. A total of 5142 patients were divided into those followed in the intensive care unit (ICU) and those followed in the ward. Patient medical records were examined retrospectively. ROC analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) values were 0.714, 0.750, 0.843 for MPV, RDW and D-Dimer, the cutoff value was 10.45fl, 43.65fl, 500.2 ng/mL respectively. (all P < .001). Survival analysis showed that patients with MPV >10.45 f/l and D-Dimer >500.2 ng/mL, treatment with ASA had lower in-hospital and 180-day mortality than patients without ASA in ICU patients (HR = 0.773; 95% CI = 0.595-0.992; P = .048, HR = 0.763; 95% CI = 0.590-0.987; P = .036). Administration of low-dose ASA in addition to anti-coagulant according to MPV and D-dimer levels reduces mortality.


Subject(s)
Blood Platelets , COVID-19/blood , Erythrocyte Indices , Erythrocytes , Mean Platelet Volume , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Blood Platelets/drug effects , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
7.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 53(1): 88-95, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1252194

ABSTRACT

Although COVID-19 disease primarily affects the respiratory system, it has been seen in many studies that it causes thromboembolic (TE) events in many tissues and organs. So that, to prevent TE can reduce mortality and morbidity. In this context, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the previous use of warfarin or other new direct oral anticoagulants (OAC) and mortality in patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19 before hospitalization. A total of 5575 patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 were hospitalized and started treatment between March 21 and November 30, 2020 were included in the study. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. A retrospective cohort study design was planned. Patients were followed up until death or censoring on November 30, 2020. The candidate predictors for primary outcome should be clinically and biologically plausible, and their relationships with all-cause death should be demonstrated in previous studies. We considered all candidate predictors included in the model in accordance with these principles. The main candidate predictor was previous OAC use. The primary analysis method was to compare the time to deaths of patients using and not using previous OAC by a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model (CPHM). In the CPHM, previous OAC use was found to be associated with a significantly lower mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.92, p = 0.030). In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, in patients who previously used anticoagulantswas associated with lower risk of in-hospital death than in those who did not.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , COVID-19 , Hospital Mortality , Thromboembolism , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
8.
J Med Virol ; 93(5): 3015-3022, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1196535

ABSTRACT

In the current study, we aimed to develop and validate a model, based on our nationwide centralized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) database for predicting death. We conducted an observational study (CORONATION-TR registry). All patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Turkey between March 11 and June 22, 2020 were included. We developed the model and validated both temporal and geographical models. Model performances were assessed by area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC or c-index), R2 , and calibration plots. The study population comprised a total of 60,980 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Of these patients, 7688 (13%) were transferred to intensive care unit, 4867 patients (8.0%) required mechanical ventilation, and 2682 patients (4.0%) died. Advanced age, increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, creatinine, albumine, and D-dimer levels, and pneumonia on computed tomography, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure status at admission were found to be the strongest predictors of death at 30 days in the multivariable logistic regression model (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic = 0.942; 95% confidence interval: 0.939-0.945; R2 = .457). There were also favorable temporal and geographic validations. We developed and validated the prediction model to identify in-hospital deaths in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Our model achieved reasonable performances in both temporal and geographic validations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Risk , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Turkey/epidemiology
9.
Atherosclerosis ; 325: 83-88, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1188306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Myocardial injury defined by elevation of cardiac troponins (cTn) in the course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been reported, though not fully characterized yet. Using the Turkish nationwide centralized COVID-19 database, we sought to determine whether cTn measured within 24 h of admission may help identify 30-day all-cause mortality in hospitalized patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at all hospitals in Turkey between March 11, 2020, and June 22, 2020. All hospitalized COVID-19 patients (≥18 years) who had cTn measurements within 24 h of admission were included. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 14,855 COVID-19 patients (median age 49 years and 54% male) from 81 provinces of Turkey were included. Of these, 2020 patients (13.6%) were transferred to intensive care unit, 1165 patients (7.8%) needed mechanical ventilation, and 882 patients (5.9%) died during hospitalization. The prevalence of cTn positivity was 6.9% (n = 1027) in the hospitalized patients. cTn positivity was 5% in those patients alive at 30-day, and 44% in those who died. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model, age, lactate dehydrogenase, and cTn were the strongest predictors of 30-day mortality, irrespective of cTn definition as a continuous, ordinal variable, or dichotomic variables. CONCLUSIONS: A single measurement of cTn at admission in patients with COVID-19 is associated with 30-day all-cause mortality and may have an important prognostic role for optimizing risk stratification.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Troponin/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Turkey/epidemiology
10.
Journal of Medical Virology ; 93(5):i-i, 2021.
Article in English | Wiley | ID: covidwho-1162845

ABSTRACT

The cover image is based on the Research Article Development and validation of clinical prediction model to estimate the probability of death in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: Insights from a nationwide database by Ibrahim Halil Tanbo?a et al., https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26844.

11.
J Infect ; 81(6): 944-951, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-799460

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and screening of frailty, a condition characterized by an increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes of COVID-19, has emerged as an essential clinical tool which is strongly recommended by healthcare providers concerned with hospitalized elderly population. The data showing the role of frailty in patients infected with COVID-19 is needed. METHODS: This was a nationwide cohort study conducted at all hospitals in Turkey. All COVID-19 hospitalized patients (≥ 65 years) were included. Patients who were alive and not discharged up to July 20, 2020, were excluded. The frailty was assessed by using the "Hospital Frailty Risk Score" (HFRS). Patients were classified into three risk groups of frailty based on previously validated cut points as low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points). Additionally, patients who had the HFRS of ≥5 were defined as frail. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality rates by frailty group. RESULTS: Between March 11, 2020, and June 22, 2020, a total of 18,234 COVID-19 patients from all of 81 provinces of Turkey were included. Totally, 12,295 (67.4%) patients were defined as frail (HFRS of >5) of which 2,801 (15.4%) patients were categorized in the highest level of frailty (HFRS of >15). Observed in-hospital mortality rates were 697 (12.0%), 1,751 (18.2%) and 867 (31.0%) in low, intermediate and high hospital frailty risk, respectively (p<0.001). Compared with low HFRS (<5), the adjusted odds ratios for in-hospital mortality were 1.482 (1.334-1.646) for intermediate HFRS (5-15) and 2.084; 95% CI, 1.799-2.413 for high HFRS (>15). CONCLUSIONS: As a claims-based frailty model, the HFRS provides clinicians and health systems, a standardized tool for an effective detection and grading of frailty in patients in COVID-19. A frailty-based tailored management of the older population may provide a more accurate risk categorization for both therapeutic and preventive strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Frail Elderly/statistics & numerical data , Frailty/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Frailty/virology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Risk Assessment/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Turkey/epidemiology
12.
J Hum Hypertens ; 35(7): 588-597, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-728973

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between worse clinical outcomes and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A total of 247 adult patients (154 males, 93 females; mean age: 51.3 ± 14.2 years) hospitalized for COVID-19 as confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were analyzed using various statistical modeling. Primary outcomes were defined as the need for intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation, or occurrence of death. Of the patients, 48 were treated in the ICU with a high flow oxygen/noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV, n = 12) or mechanical ventilation (n = 36). Median length of ICU stay was 13 (range, 7-18) days. Mortality was seen in four of the ICU patients. Other patients were followed in the COVID-19 services for a median of 7 days. There was no significant correlation between the primary outcomes and use of ACEIs/ARBs (frequentist OR = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-2.34, p = 0.715 and Bayesian posterior median OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.31-2.02) and presence of hypertension (frequentist OR = 1.23, 95% CI 0.52-2.92, p = 0.631 and Bayesian posterior median OR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.58-2.60). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and D-dimer levels were strongly associated with primary outcomes. In conclusion, the presence of hypertension and use of ACEIs/ARBs were not significantly associated with poor primary clinical outcomes; however, NLR and D-dimer levels were strong predictors of clinical worsening.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Aldosterone/adverse effects , Aldosterone/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Lymphocytes , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Renin-Angiotensin System , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL